Change the source energy, range, coupling, cavity quality factor, proof mass, and practical power benchmark. Every result is recomputed from the equations used in the completed electromagnetic-stress and torsion comparison.
These routes produced calculable stiffness responses. Their “equivalent acceleration” is a scale diagnostic only: none passed the independent exterior-inheritance gate.
| Route | Declared input | |Δ ln A₂,E| | Equivalent acceleration | Shortfall to g | Decision |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Static QED magnetic field | 10 T, transverse projection | 1.24 × 10⁻⁶³ | 5.572 × 10⁻⁴⁵ m/s² | 1.76 × 10⁴⁵ | Magnitude fails |
| Lowest free-photon cavity mode | 79.58 J/m³ in 1 cm | 2.7906 × 10⁻⁴⁷ | 1.254 × 10⁻²⁸ m/s² | 7.82 × 10²⁸ | Magnitude fails |
| 1064 nm free photons | Same energy density | 7.8982 × 10⁻⁵⁶ | 3.549 × 10⁻³⁷ m/s² | 2.763 × 10³⁷ | Magnitude fails |
| Vector Maxwell–Hopfield branch | 1 eV resonance; unit ρ tangent | 1.1747 × 10⁻⁵⁹ | 5.279 × 10⁻⁴¹ m/s² | 1.858 × 10⁴¹ | Local only |
The 1/f² photon weighting is real: lower modes improve the response. They still miss one g by nearly 29 orders in the most favorable direct-photon benchmark, before exterior inheritance is demanded.
The calculation sequence deliberately moved from kinematics to the electromagnetic source, matter transfer, exterior propagation, torsion, criticality, and finally engineering bounds.
A constant soft background covariantizes the existing kernel but does not intrinsically retune the stiffness of an unchanged local state. The two-derivative term cannot supply the required hard Q² slope.
The RF² electron loop creates a real anisotropic control coefficient. At 10 T the fractional response is only about 10⁻⁶³ to 10⁻⁶⁵ and supplies no useful low-energy pole.
Counterpropagating fields give zero mean momentum with finite longitudinal pressure. Mirrors, drive, charged matter, and supports must be included; the stationary apparatus closes the conserved stress ledger.
Linear polariton splitting changes spectral shape, not the mean common scale. A nonlinear pump can move a bare material scale and create TT-active anisotropy, opening a calculable local response.
The gauge-consistent vector response is finite and resonance-centered, but tiny. A finite driven slab changes reflection and Casimir-type boundary observables; its controlled exterior bulk derivative is zero.
Minimal Maxwell theory has no independent spin-connection source. Axial torsion can couple to intrinsic spin, but it is spin-selective and does not supply the missing universal unpolarized TT receiver.
Formal gain is the inverse distance to a zero eigenvalue. Amplifying the calculated one-eV numerator requires stability margins of roughly 10⁻⁴² to 10⁻⁴⁴ across centimetre-to-metre scales.
A healthy pole can propagate an exterior field, but its residue factorizes into source and receiver couplings, so the same product is exposed to fifth-force bounds. Even α× = 10³ leaves a 15–19 order force deficit at 1 MJ.
Stored electromagnetic energy gravitates normally and is inherited by independent matter. At one metre, one g requires 1.3206 × 10²⁸ J—about 1.469 × 10¹¹ kg of mass-equivalent energy.
The WarpDriveTech research home now reports all six main papers and both technical-appendix volumes. This engineering audit remains separate so its controller result does not obscure the theory, cosmology, vacuum, and black-hole results.
The calculator preserves the intentionally favorable assumptions of the final BC-2L gate. It is an upper-bound stress test, not a conservative hardware projection.
ΔlnA₂,E = 2gλ/c²One-g stiffness target
a₂ = (2/e)αGU/(c²λ²)Optimistic finite-range spin-two acceleration at r = λ
U₁g = (e/2)gc²λ²/(αG)Stored energy required for one g
f = c/(4πλ)Spatially matched standing-wave frequency
P = Uω/QSustaining power, with ω = c/(2λ)
aG = GU/(c²λ²)Ordinary gravity of stored energy